Hey all. The C414 has two versions. He has also informed me that the tension on the diaphragms are very good. The appearance of the C414 begins with its compact, somewhat box-shaped design. A friend of mine has one and it sounds great. At $700 no AKG 414 is a good deal not even a new in the box XLII. They seem to be pretty flat across the spectrum which make the silver ones or ULS good for instruments for a very even sound. The C414 XLII is the successor of the famous C414 B-TL II. Comparison in a nutshell: AKG C414 XLS: bright, but more of a workhorse mic. Designed for accurate reproduction and transparency, the AKG C414 XLS features the same capsule as the popular C414 B-ULS. A slight additional lift above 3kHz gives this model a slightly more airy and open top end that is useful when miking vocals to capture a contemporary 'crisp' sound, or when miking instruments … I found a Pearlman TM-1 for $1100 and it was the difference between pro gear and prosumer versus the XLII. 79% Upvoted . Is there much of a sound difference when it comes to vocals for both of the condensers? Hey there! channel strip and it sounded amazing. hide. Don't the EB's use a real C12 capsule? There was an added depth and detail that is missing in the nylon capsule. I would think if they previously had a transformer, it would be similar to a comparison of a AT 4033 (transformerless) and 4047 (transformer built in). save. However, the C414 XLII has the same capsule design as the legendary C12, giving it a 3kHz presence … This thread is archived. i.e. But there are a few important distinctions, mostly concerning the way they cover the frequencies. heh. Older is better. For live sound applications and permanent installations, all controls can easily be disabled for trouble-free use. So what capsule did the 414 Comb have? The C414 XLII's slight presence boost and impressive spatial reproduction are both similar to the legendary AKG C12 microphone from 1953.” I traded an SPX-90 for it (back in the day) with a friend who owned a studio- good trade. I had to replace the capsule in '91, but the electronics are all original. The older mics are usually very simple. Beide Modelle bieten umfassende Möglichkeiten, um sich an unterschiedlichste Aufnahmesituationen anzupassen. My EB sounds really open and natural, especially in omni. How it compares to the 414 XLII? I did a search here on gearslutz and someone had picked up a pair for quite a bit less than this. IMHO it is more likely the electronics, particularly the absence of transformers etc. I don't know the market for them today, so I don't know if $700 is a good price, but I would pay it in a second if I had to replace this one. Another vote for the older EB. I've heard the new 414's and I don't care for them. which causes this. I just bought a 414B-ULS for $500 from one of the folks here on this board. The only reason AKG still makes 414s and they are so well known is they are STILL living off the reputation built by the CK12 brass capsule from 30+ years ago. Try the mic in question and see if you like it!! I was very disappointed. akg c414 XLS vs C414 XLII? All the 414's I have heard were transformerless. So i have been using the akg c414 xls for quite some time for vocal recordings. I think the EB is really an older mic. If its a goood mic I would love to save the money off buying a new one, but at the same time I dont want ot end up with an old mic within a couple of years of the end of its life just to save a couple hundred bucks. When I visited Dale Pro Audio in NYC they had the gold 414 and I tried my vocals through it with a Pend. http://www.akg.com/products//powersl...nguage,EN.html, http://www.akg.com/mediadatabase/psf...5c0ffc4faf.pdf, AKG C414B XLII Microphone 414 B XLII c414bXLII C 414B - eBay (item 220685079765 end time Nov-18-10 02:00:00 PST), http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/nov0...es/akgmics.htm, Slate Digital Launches The VIRTUAL MICROPHONE SYSTEM. If it is red-ish in color, it's the newer capsule. It’s slightly warmer than the XLII. I would get a matched pair of C414xls's if given no other option. report. AKG C414-EB vs C414 XLS or XLII I have been thinking of picking up one of the new AKG C414's after being impressed with it during a friends session. The C414 XLS (left) is more transparent sounding than the C414 XLII, but the latter has a presence boost similar to the legendary C12, which makes it quite flattering on many sources. Although the design is basic, the beautiful gold grille found on the C414 XLII, makes … The mic sounded so much better than with the Nylon CK12. Just a friendly reminder that political discussion, (including "offhand" and 'sideways' commenting) is. While AKG has retired most of the C414 lines in its cabinet, it currently sells two versions: the XLS and XLII. If you need a brighter sound, the XL II is your best bet. But it does seem like I've heard of these being a little tempermental. Well regardless of what people think of this Mic, you can't beat this price with a stick. The only distinction between the XLS and the XL II is a difference in the capsules to achieve the desired acoustical response for each version. The AKG C414 XLII and XLS keep the classic shape that its predecessors have become famous for. Like I said before the newer gold ones have a raise that is designed for vocals. The new ones have the same sonic idea basically, but they sound, I don't know, kind of "plasticky", if that makes sense. The EB's are pretty bright to my ears, but in a good usable way. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. AKG C414 XLII Vs XLS. C414 Capsules Explained. I have an EB with the ck12 capsule on it... it's presently being cleaned up by Klaus. Although the design is basic, the beautiful gold grille found on the C414 XLII, makes this microphone appear quite flashy when in the studio. When you buy products through links across our site, we may earn an affiliate commission. The C414 XLII version differs from the C414 XLS version in one major respect – the capsule. There alone is your choice. One of each is not a bad idea for variety, but a matched stereo pair of one or the other would seem to be a more sensible choice. Or is there very little in difference between the two? Is the guy offering to sell me this mic completely out of reality with his pricing? I had an opportunity to test this old myth on several occasions. I was very disappointed. I found a Pearlman TM-1 for $1100 and it was the difference between pro gear and prosumer versus the XLII.