0000004498 00000 n
<>/Pattern<>/ExtGState<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 720 540] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>>
0000022088 00000 n
0000029582 00000 n
Canellopoulou-Bottis, Maria, Utilitarianism v. Deontology: A Philosophy for Copyright (December 10, 2018). To learn more, visit our Cookies page. 0000033342 00000 n
0000005308 00000 n
/S 505
Either way, a means to an end proved positive. /Type /Catalog
h�bbd``b`��@�i>��$X��$>��"@�s%��*�@B�,H�:�`�1���L��@F10RD�g�� � �y$
endstream
endobj
startxref
0
%%EOF
104 0 obj
<>stream
0000025823 00000 n
0000041534 00000 n
x�c```f`��d`g`��f`�NmVv�-
>,j���(r����`��P�Y����V��n���K�版(�^Sz�����%���g�����k�}]��$���G!���ؽ5 h�b```�0 i��π ��@Q�
��^���S*69���_�P��К��dp������'f�3�ѵ``����?h��X��az�T:�cV�UCG�D��� �8:���b@P� In fact, they are two different schools of thought regarding morality. Consequences of those actions are not taken into consideration. U05: Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions in the Context of International Management: A valuable Approach to compare Cultures? >>
PSY 833: Ethics and Leadership (Buban) © 2020. endobj
To better understand deontology vs utilitarianism, let’s use an example that features a moral dilemma. 0000027072 00000 n
/Names 330 0 R
0000035555 00000 n
In some situations we decide with our hearts, in other situations with our brains” ( Guzman, 2016). 0000013248 00000 n
stream
Kant vs. Mill Deontology vs. Utilitarianism In any functioning society, a system of morals must be present to establish what is right and wrong. We make decisions based on what we believe is right and what is best for us, but not necessarily for everyone else. 0000028510 00000 n
/Root 411 0 R
Without such a 0
Utilitarianism (also called consequentialism) is a moral theory developed and refined in the modern world in the writings of Jeremy Bentham (1748-1832) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873). All Rights Reserved. ����+,? Reference: Immanuel Kant, the ethics systems celebrated proponent, formulated the most influential form of a secular deontological moral theory in 1788. 0000028870 00000 n
���3{ڃ�I[o���/z��Vj�R �unQ��߂&��WG߄��@�\��eD� �93"!��/�в"!�r-��zP����N���&�z�N)xѿ �1Bss��^aA�a�Ox��FQ�-� /O 412
0000038985 00000 n
0000003686 00000 n
<>/Font<>/ProcSet[/PDF/Text/ImageB/ImageC/ImageI] >>/MediaBox[ 0 0 595.32 841.92] /Contents 4 0 R/Group<>/Tabs/S/StructParents 0>>
���\ ͢�a�.�N�[�_����i���b�A���52�BT�w�+� �t�5�ɪm���[g�A%�7����Y���|�܂��e'��C}�%Y���h��x}��L��Lp!˚�3�}\ �\~I�S� g Ethics depend on a moral framework. In brief, deontology is patient-centered, whereas utilitarianism is society-centered. Peter doesn’t have enough time to earn the money needed for the surgery because his son is in a critical condition. 0000034370 00000 n
0000038583 00000 n
xref
/PageLabels 408 0 R
The Anglosaxon copyright system is founded upon theories of utilitarianism, whereas the European system, generally upon deontology. 0000030735 00000 n
/Length 496
411 96
The work, finally, arrives at a conclusion founded upon the supremacy of the deontological reasoning behind copyright. 0000034021 00000 n
/E 30011
DEONTOLOGY vs UTILITARIANISM The theory of deontology is derived from the writings of German philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724-1804). As a parent I have an obligation to protect my child, and I would say that there is no ethical framework that would disagree with this. Posted: 27 Dec 2018, Information Law, DALMS, Ionian University. Originally, Jeremy Bentham, the founder of Utilitarianism, defined utility as the aggregate pleasure after deducting suffering of all involved in any action. endobj
0000036925 00000 n
/Outlines 454 0 R
Subtle Distinction According to American philosopher John Rawls, under deontology, an action is right if it is good and vice versa. As we can see with this example, ethical dilemmas are not easy to solve.