How to ingest and analyze benchmark results posted at MSE? No problems here. More posts from the askphilosophy community. Although the term "culture" has been around at least since the early Christian era (we know, for instance, that Cicero used it), its anthropological use was established between the end of eighteen-hundreds and the beginning of the past century. Given some proof we were told is correct, we basically stop thinking about it once we feel we 'understand' it. You have understood something, but judge yourself not to have. What does it mean to have an “account” of something? The term was probably coined by Pythagoras (c. 570 – 495 BCE). I understand where my friends will be going. What does “physical” mean to philosophers? Does the dog consider a bunch of propositions before chasing down the stick? That's not really true. As soon as you edit it, it will show up in the reopen queue. How does linux retain control of the CPU on a single-core machine? Looking for a function that approximates a parabola, Mentor added his name as the author and changed the series of authors into alphabetical order, effectively putting my name at the last. I understand that part of the point of philosophy is just this: to ask and reconsider the most basic of our assumptions. Press J to jump to the feed. My planet has a long period orbit. It also tries to understand how things should be. In most cases, this does not mean the theory is immune from falsification or to being disproved--it's not absolute. You realize that basically no 'on hold' questions are brought back to normal state. You have understood something, and judge yourself to have. What are the factors that determine whether a belief is rational or irrational? What Jane did was wrong. This case is probably most problematic. /r/askphilosophy aims to provide serious, well-researched answers to philosophical questions. Why were there only 531 electoral votes in the US Presidential Election 2016? The reflective, representational stuff comes after. Bear in mind that when you are reading philosophy what you are actually doing is trying to understand a piece of writing. site design / logo © 2020 Stack Exchange Inc; user contributions licensed under cc by-sa. It only takes a minute to sign up. rev 2020.11.24.38066, The best answers are voted up and rise to the top, Philosophy Stack Exchange works best with JavaScript enabled, Start here for a quick overview of the site, Detailed answers to any questions you might have, Discuss the workings and policies of this site, Learn more about Stack Overflow the company, Learn more about hiring developers or posting ads with us. What does “obtain” mean in philosophy jargon? You have not understood something, and judge yourself not to have. You have not understood something, but judge yourself to have. Philosophy Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for those interested in the study of the fundamental nature of knowledge, reality, and existence. Philosophy (from Greek: φιλοσοφία, philosophia, 'love of wisdom') is the study of general and fundamental questions, such as those about existence, knowledge, values, reason, mind, and language. Menary’s ‘cognitive integration’ thesis (and the bulk of Andy Clark’s work (et.al)), detail what I’m essentially trying to say here- cognition subserves/leverages, pragmatic (or ecological) agency. being able to teach it to someone else, replicate the steps in a proof, but you intuitively believe that there is more that you need to know in order for it to count as understanding, according to your self-imposed definition. What is the difference between knowing something and just believing it? - introduces a notion of defeasibility which could be useful in fine-tuning your understanding. However, this is not a philosophical site but rather a site about philosophy. In the end, we take it as an axiom that if a billion people find no flaw in a statement, then we could accept it as an axiom. This suggests that in order for the concept of 'understanding' to have any practical import, we have to set a lower benchmark than "complete, unfalsifiable knowledge". Deconstruction is an approach to understanding the relationship between text and meaning.It was originated by the philosopher Jacques Derrida (1930–2004), who defined the term variously throughout his career. r/philosophy: The portal for public philosophy. Philosophy is a field of study about the concepts that underlie things. The Philosophy Foundation’s account attempts to capture something of its spirit, structure, content, method, aims and hopes, but our account is inextricably personal to us and culturally specific. In Aristotle, What does it mean for something to be predicated? Friends, Are We Not Philosophers: Is This Place a Bazaar or a Cathedral? The way I see it, we could have two construals of “understanding”- a weak and a strong one. But that’s not the w… I think he adopts a position that’s couched in epistemological terms, which comes off as a little circular- explaining a cognitive faculty in terms or more cognitive faculties. And you know that you understand it. You don't get what implicit differentiation is. Research philosophy is an important part of research methodology. What does it mean? On the issue of falsification, it is true that most of what we believe ourselves to understand could be falsified under some imaginable circumstance. Tim Robberts / Getty Images. Non-explanatory Interrogative Embedded question that does not seek an explanation as its answer (most who, where, what, and when questions) I understand who my friends are.